Gene's Footnotes

I have never been impressed by the messenger and always inspect the message, which I now understand is not the norm. People prefer to filter out discordant information. As such, I am frequently confronted with, "Where did you hear that...." Well, here you go. If you want an email version, send me an email.

December 18, 2008

The Avalanche Begins


You can't be surprised.  

Below is an excerpt of an article you could read over in 20 seconds, as you have heard it all before, here.  If you want the Senate minority report.  Hit Here.   Thanks Rod.

I explained long, long ago that scientists careers depend on credibility. As the preposterous "warming" assumptions are revealed to the common person to be silly, reputable scientists will have to jump to pointing out the Emperor is not wearing clothing, even in the face of University or government threats. 

The left had its government-university-media complex at work funding the fear of the end of the world, as a political tactic to gain control and money, but they had to know its life span was limited, so look for the next crises, or are we in it? Wasn't it Saul Alinski, the Columbia radical whose group hired a young Obama, who said you can take control by creating constant turmoil, i.e. fear? 

On the other hand, our dull grammar and high school teachers will be repeating their unions' mantra even after their deaths. So, a new generation of non-critical, scientific illiterates will cause problems for decades. Really, all you have to do to destroy the United States is get control of the public school machine. How can a parent express doubt about a law of nature espoused by the "teacher?"  Most parents were produced by those same "teachers."

The scientists who were highly dedicated and actually studying subjects related to the planet never signed on to the hysteria and a few were adamant that they never agreed with our mysterious UN "scientists" who voted on a principle of nature, even though the UN reports named them as signing on.

Anyway, the arctic will be gone in four years, the Gore warning being issued a year ago.  So, there will be a reduction in global shipping, especially if we use sails. I sure hope the warming doesn't continue to heat Mars.

Today's fact:  Henry Paulson (Goldman Sachs) helped Gore start the carbon credit business. 

I think I am too late to sell credits in wind turbines.  I hope not, what a brilliant scam.  The wind turbine project lost its three funding institutions, so only the Farm bureau still has funds to lose, er disperse.  Failing that, I will be soliciting credit investment from you. After all, we will need wind power, once the nuclear plants and coal mines are shut down by the elected out patients.

Things are not looking good, so don't feel smart. The crowd has formed, extinguishing individual thought and work, so put peanut butter in the basement and gold in the yard. It is that bad. 

When I lived in Canada, not so long ago, a popular book came out that I may replicate here: Take The Money and Run

- - - - - - - - - - - - 

UN Blowback: More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
December 10, 2008
Posted by Marc Morano – 9:36 AM ET - Marc_Morano@EPW.Senate.GOV
UN Blowback: More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims

Study: Half of warming due to Sun! –Sea Levels Fail to Rise? - Warming Fears in 'Dustbin of History'

'No evidence for accelerated sea-level rise'

POZNAN, Poland - The UN global warming conference currently underway in Poland is about to face a serious challenge from over 650 dissenting scientists from around the globe who are criticizing the climate claims made by the UN IPCC and former Vice President Al Gore. Set for release this week, a newly updated U.S. Senate Minority Report features the dissenting voices of over 650 international scientists, many current and former UN IPCC scientists, who have now turned against the UN. The report has added about 250 scientists (and growing) in 2008 to the over 400 scientists who spoke out in 2007. The over 650 dissenting scientists are more than 12 times the number of UN scientists (52) who authored the media hyped IPCC 2007 Summary for Policymakers.

The U.S. Senate report is the latest evidence of the growing groundswell of scientific opposition rising to challenge the UN and Gore. Scientific meetings are now being dominated by a growing number of skeptical scientists. The prestigious International Geological Congress, dubbed the geologists' equivalent of the Olympic Games, was held in Norway in August 2008 and prominently featured the voices and views of scientists skeptical of man-made global warming fears. [See Full report Here: & See: Skeptical scientists overwhelm conference: '2/3 of presenters and question-askers were hostile to, even dismissive of, the UN IPCC' ]

Full Senate Report Set To Be Released in the Next 24 Hours – Stay Tuned…

A hint of what the upcoming report contains:

“I am a skeptic…Global warming has become a new religion.” - Nobel Prize Winner for Physics, Ivar Giaever.

“Since I am no longer affiliated with any organization nor receiving any funding, I can speak quite frankly….As a scientist I remain skeptical.” - Atmospheric Scientist Dr. Joanne Simpson, the first woman in the world to receive a PhD in meteorology and formerly of NASA who has authored more than 190 studies and has been called “among the most preeminent scientists of the last 100 years.”

Warming fears are the “worst scientific scandal in the history…When people come to know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists.” - UN IPCC Japanese Scientist Dr. Kiminori Itoh, an award-winning PhD environmental physical chemist.

“The IPCC has actually become a closed circuit; it doesn’t listen to others. It doesn’t have open minds… I am really amazed that the Nobel Peace Prize has been given on scientifically incorrect conclusions by people who are not geologists,” - Indian geologist Dr. Arun D. Ahluwalia at Punjab University and a board member of the UN-supported International Year of the Planet.

“The models and forecasts of the UN IPCC "are incorrect because they only are based on mathematical models and presented results at scenarios that do not include, for example, solar activity.” - Victor Manuel Velasco Herrera, a researcher at the Institute of Geophysics of the National Autonomous University of Mexico....
Gee, we forgot to include the sun in those really clever miscalculations.

Labels: , ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home