Gene's Footnotes

I have never been impressed by the messenger and always inspect the message, which I now understand is not the norm. People prefer to filter out discordant information. As such, I am frequently confronted with, "Where did you hear that...." Well, here you go. If you want an email version, send me an email.

March 14, 2014

Paper: The Demise of U.S. Economic Growth


You can access this paper as noted. Here is the abstract:

The Demise of U.S. Economic Growth: Restatement, Rebuttal, and Reflections

Robert J. Gordon

NBER Working Paper No. 19895
Issued in February 2014
NBER Program(s):   DAE   EFG   PR 
The United States achieved a 2.0 percent average annual growth rate of real GDP per capita between 1891 and 2007. This paper predicts that growth in the 25 to 40 years after 2007 will be much slower, particularly for the great majority of the population. Future growth will be 1.3 percent per annum for labor productivity in the total economy, 0.9 percent for output per capita, 0.4 percent for real income per capita of the bottom 99 percent of the income distribution, and 0.2 percent for the real disposable income of that group.
The primary cause of this growth slowdown is a set of four headwinds, all of them widely recognized and uncontroversial. Demographic shifts will reduce hours worked per capita, due not just to the retirement of the baby boom generation but also as a result of an exit from the labor force both of youth and prime-age adults. Educational attainment, a central driver of growth over the past century, stagnates at a plateau as the U.S. sinks lower in the world league tables of high school and college completion rates. Inequality continues to increase, resulting in real income growth for the bottom 99 percent of the income distribution that is fully half a point per year below the average growth of all incomes. A projected long-term increase in the ratio of debt to GDP at all levels of government will inevitably lead to more rapid growth in tax revenues and/or slower growth in transfer payments at some point within the next several decades.
There is no need to forecast any slowdown in the pace of future innovation for this gloomy forecast to come true, because that slowdown already occurred four decades ago. In the eight decades before 1972 labor productivity grew at an average rate 0.8 percent per year faster than in the four decades since 1972. While no forecast of a future slowdown of innovation is needed, skepticism is offered here, particularly about the techno-optimists who currently believe that we are at a point of inflection leading to faster technological change. The paper offers several historical examples showing that the future of technology can be forecast 50 or even 100 years in advance and assesses widely discussed innovations anticipated to occur over the next few decades, including medical research, small robots, 3-D printing, big data, driverless vehicles, and oil-gas fracking.
You may purchase this paper on-line in .pdf format from SSRN.com ($5) for electronic delivery.

My observation is kept to the point of the education collapse in the U.S.  It is not merely the quantitative analysis of the failure to complete high school and college, it is the qualitative observation that the schools are low quality.  

This is especially at our pretend brand schools where quality education used to be certain.

It is becoming obvious to young people that paying tens  of thousands of dollars for an education is tree studies or happy-land green studies is waste of time. This is actually a good sign. Wasting wealth is never good for a culture and transferring it to teachers and administrators, where they do not teach real life skills, adds nothing to the increase in the commonwealth. 

Labels:

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home