Gene's Footnotes

I have never been impressed by the messenger and always inspect the message, which I now understand is not the norm. People prefer to filter out discordant information. As such, I am frequently confronted with, "Where did you hear that...." Well, here you go. If you want an email version, send me an email.

November 27, 2007

Notes on Tuvalu


Proof of Global Warming, thanks to Dale and those clever Thais.


Dale and I decided we would go live on Tuvalu and personally measure the rising or falling ocean level during rum breaks, not that there is a causal relationship there.

The ocean rising threat was made popular by the Daily Mirror in London and the Washington Post back in 2002 or 2003. It doesn't matter enough to look it up. The CATO Institute mocked the articles saying a recent Science magazine piece contradicted the panic invoked in the Washington Post article.

I looked into this claim and didn't find that the magazine said sea levels had actually decreased. It did say how terribly difficult it is to say one way or the other.

The lack of any real data was intriguing. You would think we knew more about the ocean level, but, then again, how? What do you measure the ocean against? Surely not sea level.

The CATO article claimed you can't measure it against the Tuvalu beach. The beach being smaller, in some places, because the sand was being removed for building. This argument seems to be somewhat supported by a Chinese study noted below. That study concluded there was inappropriate human activity in areas showing signs of reduced beach, etc. and not much evidence that the ocean was creeping in on the poor folks.

I have collected some abstracts and have listed them below along with links. Let me grossly summarize by saying this oceanography seems a young science with precious little firm stuff to grab onto regarding sea level. It is hard to walk on water. The scientists seem to agree that the last hundred years saw a sea rise, sort of and more or less depending where you are, of 1.8 mm/y give or take one or two tenths of a mm. [what the hell is that in metric speak?]

The rise for the this long period remains unexplained by scientists, except by the unnamed ones at the IPCC who say the 1990's 3mm/yr increase was caused by thermal expansion of the water, more than half the increase, and the rest by glacial run off. I didn't find any studies anywhere that even mentioned such notions. There is an AGU abstract (boy, I hope these abstracts aren't hoaxes) that has similar higher numbers in places measured but says such flucuation is within the error posited by prior estimates. The curious language is that they were looking at the excess rise in sea level, as though a rise in the 2mm area is the norm.

By the way, 1 mm is a thousandth of a m. A m is the socialist term for almost a yard. They call the m a meter, oh, sorry, a metre. One mm, or 3.2808×10−3 feet, is really small. Another way to think about it is the Gene Standard Units. Two mm = the diameter of my pencil's lead, the GU. So, the oceans have been increasing by one Gene Unit per year, more or less. You can see the difficulty of trying to measure an increase in the sea by Gene Units. At the current rate of increase, even assuming the IPCC's rate of 1.5 GU/yr, in a hundred years there will be nearly, using God's measurements, almost a foot rise.

OK, to be honest that is something to ponder. By itself, such a rise would be meaningless to humans over a 100 years, again assuming constant increase, so the focus of concern needs to be on the notion that the earth's ice will melt rapidly in significant amounts. If so, then you need to buy that house on a good rise.

What I found curious is that one study found the Mediterranean Sea to have been actually lowering since the 1960's (-1.3 mm/yr) when other places maintained the old rate or slightly lower rate of increase, i.e. not the IPCC's 3 mm/yr. As the title indicates, the lowering is said to be consistent with the warming and increasing salt content of the water. Other articles, as well as the IPCC, posit that seal level was rising because of the warming of the water. I don't think it can be both, can it? Any answers out there?

By the way, from what I learned, you don't want to move to TUVALU for reasons other than inundation. Maybe Hawaii? Or, the new resort Sitka.

Some light reading:

Xue Chunting 1 Contact Information

(1) Qingdao Institute of Marine Geology, 266071 Qingdao, P.R.China

Received: 29 December 2003 Accepted: 25 June 2004

Abstract Studies on land loss in Tuvalu reveal the following findings. Although both sea level rise and coastal erosion can cause land loss in the tropic Pacific oceanic islands, their mechanisms are different. When sea level rises, the low elevation coastal zone submerges and the erosion datum plane rises, the beach process progresses normally as always, resulting in no beach sediment coarsening. When the sea level is stable, coastal erosion removes finer sediment from reef flat, beach and land, resulting in beach sediment coarsening. The human-induced coastal erosion in the tropic Pacific oceanic islands has the following features. 1) Erosion occurs or intensifies immediately after inappropriate human activities. 2) It occurs near the places having human activities and places related to the above places in sediment supply. 3) It often occurs on original prograding or stable coasts (on lagoon coasts for atolls) because there are more coastal engineering projects and other human activities on such coasts. 4) It is chronic, covering a long period of time. The coastal geological events in Tuvalu islands do not accord with the features resulted from sea level rise but do accord with the features resulted from coastal erosion, particularly from human-induced erosion. The land loss in Tuvalu is mainly caused by inappropriate human activities including coastal engineering and aggregate mining, and partly caused by cyclones. Moreover, all recent measurements (satellite altimetry, thermosteric sea level data and tide observations) so far have not been able to verify any sea level rise around Tuvalu islands.

Key Words sea level rise - land loss - coastal erosion - artificial channel - aggregate mining


Contact Information Xue Chunting
Email: chunting@qingdao.cngb.com
LINK


Link

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 27, NO. 12, PAGES 1731–1734, 2000

Sea level drop in the Mediterranean sea: An indicator of deep water salinity and temperature changes?

Michael N. Tsimplis

James Rennell Division for Ocean Circulation and Climate, Southampton Oceanography Centre and Institute of Maritime Law, University of Southampton, United Kingdom


Trevor F. Baker

Centre for Coastal and Marine Sciences, Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory, Bidston Observatory, United Kingdom


Abstract

Coastal sea level data from seven tide gauges in the Western Mediterranean and the Adriatic show decreasing sea levels after 1960. Control stations in the Black Sea and in the northeastern Atlantic indicate sea levels still rising after 1960. The sea level trend in the Mediterranean before 1960 was between 1.2 and 1.5 mm yr−1, while in the Atlantic and the Black Sea stations it was between 1.8 and 2.2 mm yr−1. After 1960 the sea level in the Mediterranean is decreasing with rates up to −1.3 mm yr−1, while in the Black Sea the sea level trend remains unaltered and at the Atlantic stations sea level keeps rising with reduced rates of 1.0–1.2 mm yr−1. The change of the Mediterranean sea level trends, which is in excess of the sea level trend reduction at the Atlantic sites, is consistent with increases in temperature and salinity of the Mediterranean Deep Water. The reduction of sea level trends at the Atlantic sites is probably related to the North Atlantic Oscillation. © 2000 American Geophysical Union

Index Terms:

GLOBAL SEA RISE: A REDETERMINATION

Bruce C. Douglas1

(1) Department of Geography, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
Abstract It is well established that sea level trends obtained from tide gauge records shorter than about 50-60 years are corrupted by interdecadal sea level variation. However, only a fraction (<25%) href="http://www.springerlink.com/content/p364381652174757/"> LINK

Original Article

Seasonal global mean sea level change from satellite altimeter, GRACE, and geophysical models

J. L. Chen1 Contact Information, C. R. Wilson1, 2 Contact Information, B. D. Tapley1, J. S. Famiglietti3 Contact Information and Matt Rodell4 Contact Information

(1) Center for Space Research, 3925 W. Braker Lane, Suite 200, Austin, TX 78759-5321, USA
(2) Department of Geological Science, The University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station C1100, Austin, TX 78712-0254, USA
(3) Department of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
(4) Hydrological Sciences Branch, Code 614.3, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA

Received: 5 May 2005 Accepted: 9 August 2005 Published online: 10 November 2005

Abstract We estimate seasonal global mean sea level changes using different data resources, including sea level anomalies from satellite radar altimetry, ocean temperature and salinity from the World Ocean Atlas 2001, time-variable gravity observations from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) mission, and terrestrial water storage and atmospheric water vapor changes from the NASA global land data assimilation system and National Centers for Environmental Prediction reanalysis atmospheric model. The results from all estimates are consistent in amplitude and phase at the annual period, in some cases with remarkably good agreement. The results provide a good measure of average annual variation of water stored within atmospheric, land, and ocean reservoirs. We examine how varied treatments of degree-2 and degree-1 spherical harmonics from GRACE, laser ranging, and Earth rotation variations affect GRACE mean sea level change estimates. We also show that correcting the standard equilibrium ocean pole tide correction for mass conservation is needed when using satellite altimeter data in global mean sea level studies. These encouraging results indicate that is reasonable to consider estimating longer-term time series of water storage in these reservoirs, as a way of tracking climate change.

Keywords Sea level change - Global - Seasonal - GRACE - Altimeter - Hydrology


Contact InformationJ. L. Chen
Email: chen@csr.utexas.edu
Phone: +1-512-2326218
Fax: +1-512-4713570

Contact InformationC. R. Wilson
Email: crwilson@mail.utexas.edu

Contact InformationJ. S. Famiglietti
Email: jfamigli@uci.edu

Contact InformationMatt Rodell
Email: Matthew.Rodell@nasa.gov

References secured to subscribers. LINK



American Geophysical Union Become an AGU Member
Subscribe to AGU Journals
AGU Home AGU Publications


Subscriber Access to Full Article (Nonsubscribers may purchase for $9.00, Includes print PDF, file size: 1169575 bytes)

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 110, C09006, doi:10.1029/2004JC002817, 2005

Sea level rise and the warming of the oceans in the Simple Ocean Data Assimilation (SODA) ocean reanalysis

James A. Carton

Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA


Benjamin S. Giese

Department of Oceanography, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA


Semyon A. Grodsky

Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA


Abstract

A new reanalysis of the global ocean circulation is used to distinguish between the steric and eustatic components of sea level rise. Recent altimeter observations indicate an increase in the rate of sea level rise during the past decade to 3.2 mm/yr, well above the centennial estimate of 1.5–2 mm/yr. This apparent increase could have resulted from enhanced melting of continental ice or from decadal changes in thermosteric and halosteric effects. The contribution from steric effects is explored using the new eddy-permitting Simple Ocean Data Assimilation version 1.2 (SODA1.2) reanalysis of global temperature, salinity, and sea level spanning the period 1958–2001. The applicability of this ocean reanalysis for sea level studies is evaluated by comparing subseasonal variability with a collection of 20 tide gauge station sea level records, comprising a total of 740 years of data. A positive relationship is found at all gauge stations, with an average correlation of r = 0.7 after correction for the inverted barometer effect. Dynamic height calculated relative to 1000m from the SODA1.2 reanalysis, used as a proxy for the steric component of sea level, is compared with satellite-derived sea level for the years 1993–2001. During this 9-year period dynamic height increases at a global rate of 2.3 ± 0.8 mm yr−1, a substantial acceleration beyond the multidecadal steric rate of 0.5 mm yr−1. The similarity of the rate of increase in the thermosteric contribution to sea level rise as well as the similarity of its spatial structure in comparison with satellite-derived sea level rise suggests that the recent acceleration in sea level rise is explainable to within the error estimates by fluctuations in warming and thermal expansion of the oceans.

Received 23 November 2004; accepted 25 May 2005; published 9 September 2005.

Keywords: sea level rise; ocean warming; reanalysis.

Index Terms: 4513 Oceanography: Physical: Decadal ocean variability (1616, 1635, 3305, 4215); 4556 Oceanography: Physical: Sea level: variations and mean (1222, 1225, 1641); 1616 Global Change: Climate variability (1635, 3305, 3309, 4215, 4513); 4260 Oceanography: General: Ocean data assimilation and reanalysis (3225).



JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 110, C03008, doi:10.1029/2004JC002522, 2005

Consistency of long sea-level time series in the northern coast of Spain

M. Marcos

Grup d'Oceanografia Interdisciplinar, Instituto Mediterraneo de Estudios Avanzados (UIB-CSIC), Mallorca, Spain


D. Gomis

Grup d'Oceanografia Interdisciplinar, Instituto Mediterraneo de Estudios Avanzados (UIB-CSIC), Mallorca, Spain


S. Monserrat

Grup d'Oceanografia Interdisciplinar, Instituto Mediterraneo de Estudios Avanzados (UIB-CSIC), Mallorca, Spain


E. Álvarez-Fanjul

Área del Medio Físico, Puertos del Estado, Madrid, Spain


B. Pérez

Área del Medio Físico, Puertos del Estado, Madrid, Spain


J. García-Lafuente

ETSI Telecomunicación, Departamento de Física Aplicada II, Universidad de Málaga, Malaga, Spain


Abstract

Sea-level time series recorded at three stations of the northern Spanish coast (Santander, Coruña, and Vigo) are examined with the aim of obtaining reliable interdecadal trends. The records are about 6 decades long, and their consistency is checked by means of an Empirical Orthogonal Function (EOF) analysis. Major benefits of the analysis are the detection of undocumented changes of sea-level reference and the filling of data gaps. For the last decade, the consistency of the trends is also checked against shorter, collocated and nearby records. Results indicate that during the second half of the twentieth century, sea level has been rising at a rate of 2.12, 2.51, and 2.91 mm/yr in Santander, Coruña, and Vigo, respectively. Meteorologically induced trends are evaluated from the output of a sea-level numerical model forced by a re-analysis of 44 years of atmospheric data. Results are −0.44, −0.27, and −0.21 mm/yr, respectively, indicating that in the study region the meteorological forcing acts in the sense of slightly slowing the sea-level rise. On the other hand, sea-level records and the North Atlantic mean temperature exhibit a similar interannual evolution, which points to the thermosteric effect as responsible for the positive trends. Regarding the difference between stations, about a third of it can be attributed to spatial differences in the meteorological forcing. The remaining contribution is attributed to spatial differences in the increase of the ocean heat contents, as suggested by the analysis of SST series during the last decade.

Received 8 June 2004; accepted 11 January 2005; published 8 March 2005.

Keywords: sea-level trend; meteorological forcing; steric effect; Northern Spanish coast.

Index Terms: 4556 Oceanography: Physical: Sea level: variations and mean (1222, 1225, 1641); 4215 Oceanography: General: Climate and interannual variability (1616, 1635, 3305, 3309, 4513); 4513 Oceanography: Physical: Decadal ocean variability (1616, 1635, 3305, 4215); 4594 Oceanography: Physical: Instruments and techniques.

http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2005/2004JC002522.shtml



0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home