Pelosi's "official" certification of Obama's legal qualification to be President: defective and duplicitous

Here is the ratification by the DNC used to have Barak Obama placed on the ballot in all jurisdictions.  It was given to the states to verify Mr. Obama was in compliance with Constitutional requirements (though it reads as though it is meant is to represent that he was the DNC's candidate):

Notice, no mention of the Constitution.

Below is a second ratification. Same day, same people, different language. Same typo, though I haven't seen it.  This was NOT submitted to the states:

Yes, there are two "Official Certification of Nomination" that were notarized on the same day.  That in itself is curious. No, it is suspicious.  Two official certifications? Read on.

The one that was presented to the states is missing:

"- and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution."

The sworn document that was presented to the proper election committees DID NOT have Nancy Pelosi swearing that Mr. Obama was a proper candidate.  The other document, the one not used, does. See the trick, yet?


There is a large question, now, infecting all discourse, conspiracy analysis, and law suits:  why did the DNC execute two documents, with a matching typographical error, on the same day and provide to the states the inadequate affidavit? 

Each state has to look and see what they were provided.  If it has a defective representation, then it is defective; i.e., not adequate to place Mr. Obama on the ballot. There is no grey area, here.  His place on the ballot was not legal.  This is more of that annoying legal stuff the left thinks we should be flexible about. Why have an election committee to verify qualifications if the representations don't matter?

My guess, having dealt with frauds, is that there is the second document that can be pulled out if the oversight was noticed. The DNC could say, "See, we goofed, so what the hell let the election stand."  In addition, Nancy Pelosi can say she never submitted a false oath.  A clear thinking person of honor will not fudge upon this duty.

I know, some readers think this is another conspiracy theory, which means, according to their programming, that it is from nut jobs and they should immediately glaze over and attack Bush.  I suggest people try to think for a change. 

A conspiracy theory is a conspiracy theory, not a conspiracy fantasy.  It is a theory of an illegal conspiracy, just like those every DA's office has to deal with every day.  There are many Mafia guys in jail today who were convicted of a conspiracy.  Before every conviction, there is a theory. Conspiracy is a real crime.  Theories are organized and presented to a Grand Jury everyday.

In any other election, people would be arrested at this point. This is not an oversight. You can't say, "Oops, we must have executed the two different looking documents on the same day by mistake!"  Imaging filing a false IRS return, but keeping one in reserve that you produce when your fraud is discovered. ---- Clink.

The certifications are sworn to under penalty of purjury. The execution is the basis of placing a person on the ballot to become President of the United States.  This is no minor oversight.


P.S. The RNC provided the proper certification.