Buy Cans of Coffee

I have been doing manual labor, so I sleep often and don't consider blogging a good reason to stay awake.  However, I came across an interesting article, below, from a science fiction site.  It actually addresses science as well as fiction, not blurring the two together.  Anyway, before depositing it for you, let's recap the last few years, as I have been away:

1.  There is no global warming and no one talks about it except for idiots who say the cold is the result of warming.

2.  Ice cap is coming back.

3.  Dollar is collapsing.

4.  Silver has gone from 11, when I started yelling, to over 30

5.  Obamacare is, indeed, unconstitutional.

6.  People finally can see a socialist when one stumbles in the room.

7.  Muslims still kill people, but, of course, we can't act on that.

8.  Cost of food is at an all time high (I still don't know what they mean by that)

9.  Another year of no hurricanes smashing cities.

10.  etc etc.  It must annoy you that all my ranting is correct.

Just thought I would point all this out, though obvious, so as to focus the mind and, also, to tell I told you so, which makes me feel better as I don't get paid for this.

So, if I have your interest, things to watch:

Prices have only started to go up.  If you regret missing the silver call, buy coffee in cans immediately.  (Greg suggest incandescent bulbs).  Silver is still a way to preserve your wealth, but get coins.

A constitutional fight is beginning, the sort not familiar to Americans since FDR's fascism, especially since most of us are stupid, now.  There should be no problem quelling the instability in the Supreme Court as Obama's latest appointees should recuse themselves when cases come up, but they won't as we are dealing with politics, now, not law. So, look for the final battle, here. The nation you grew up in could vanish overnight, rather than incrementally the way it is now.

ICAN has been handed over to Arab nations, so they will control who can have a ".com" and things will get ugly.  Why? you may ask.  It is because Carter already gave away the Panama Canal. Article below addresses Obama taking full control of the Internet without any distress in the press.  Imaging if Bush took control?  Obama, now, can do what was just done in Egypt and what China does daily - censor communication.

With those controls in place, the key attack will be against radio and cable as commentators are not controlled by the media complex.  The news is, even FOX, but not the characters. (Before making consensus claims about FOX, watch it.  Murdoch, btw, is a socialist, not a right with extremist.

Rapid inflation will hit in the near term,  so, as I say,  buy peanut butter and cans of coffee.  Get rid of dollars or take out a fixed mortgage as you will be paying it back with monopoly money.  If you keep your money in a bank, you will get what you deserve for being ignorant. You have never seen the likes of what is coming, so a word to the wise must be heeded.

But, good news, the US said there will be no increase in anyone's social security this year because there is NO INFLATION.  That is a good thing as I thought gasoline was over $3.30 per gallon.


-------------

Could a U.S. government crackdown take America off the internet?

 Annalee Newitz — With the threat of today's protests looming in Egypt, on Thursday Egyptian authorities cut the nation off the internet. No online communication could pass in or out of the country. We investigated whether a similar lockdown could happen in America.

Photo via asharkyu/Shutterstock

How the Egyptian government erased its citizens from the internet

No one is completely certain what happened to the Egyptian internet, but it appears that the shutdown started off early in the week with the country blocking Twitter and Facebook access for those within its borders. Then, shortly after Thursday midnight local time, the country simply disappeared from the internet. With a few exceptions like the stock exchange, Egyptian websites and services were unreachable; the network traffic over Egyptian borders dropped by an astonishing 90 percent. Cell phone networks were also down. Today Vodafone confirmed that all mobile providers been "obliged" by the Egyptian government to shut off service to customers in that country.

How did it happen? Most likely, according to experts, the Egyptian authorities made a few phone calls to the country's handful of large internet service providers. Their request would have been simple: Make it impossible for Egyptians to communicate with other countries and each other using the internet. But carrying out this order isn't like hitting an off switch.

To erase Egypt, those providers would have to corrupt routers, nodes in the internet which direct data traffic. Each router helps traffic along by advertising the many IP addresses it knows using a system called border gateway protocol (BGP). When you visit a website in Egypt, your internet provider uses BGP to ask an Egyptian router, "Hey, how do I get to this Egyptian blog?" The router responds by using BGP to send you on your merry way to the right address. BGP is basically the border language that helps different parts of the internet speak to each other.

But early Friday morning, thousands of routers in Egypt had their minds wiped. Suddenly they had no idea where anything was on the Egyptian internet. When your internet provider looked for web addresses inside Egypt, it found nothing. Egyptian routers no longer gave meaningful answers to BGP requests for border crossings.

Full size

James CowieRenesys observed the Egyptian shutdown as it happened. He wrote yesterday in a blog post:

Renesys observed the virtually simultaneous withdrawal of all routes to Egyptian networks in the Internet's global routing table. Approximately 3,500 individual BGP routes were withdrawn, leaving no valid paths by which the rest of the world could continue to exchange Internet traffic with Egypt's service providers. Virtually all of Egypt's Internet addresses are now unreachable, worldwide.

This is a completely different situation from the modest Internet manipulation that took place in Tunisia, where specific routes were blocked, or Iran, where the Internet stayed up in a rate-limited form designed to make Internet connectivity painfully slow. The Egyptian government's actions tonight have essentially wiped their country from the global map.

Could the same thing happen in America?

Egypt's internet infrastructure is quite sophisticated, and it's one of the most highly networked countries in its immediate region. Still, it was relatively easy to take the country off the net because it had a limited number of network providers. In addition, the Egyptian government has broad powers over its communication, which is why a company like Vodafone has to cut off its millions of Egyptian customers when the government comes knocking.

Despite these differences, it's very possible that Egypt's swift shutdown of its country's internet could provide a model for American governments of the future.

Alex Stamos, a computer security expert with iSEC Partners, said he'd spoken recently with U.S. officials about this possibility in the event of an internet-based attack on America. (Full disclosure: iSEC Partners has done work for io9's parent company, Gawker Media.) Stamos thinks the U.S. probably wouldn't take the country off the internet, but instead try to prevent Americans from reaching "enemy" countries or regions online. He said via e-mail:

I wouldn't be shocked if the US didn't have a gameplan to make China, Russia, North Korea and/or Iran go away in case of WWIII. The first step would be to have major US networks (UUNET, Level3, Sprint, AT&T, Verizon, Comcast, Google, BT) advertise these countries' IP ranges and "null route" the resulting packets, meaning throw them away.

He said that shutting down the internet within U.S. borders would be "almost impossible," but:

The government certainly could force AT&T, Verizon, Sprint, and T-Mobile to turn off wireless IP routing and for Comcast, AT&T, Verizon, Charter, Time Warner and the other consumer ISPs to basically shut down their networks or at least their edge routers. It's unlikely that the government would be able to force every small ISP and college to stop their peering, and corporations and other customers with multiple ISPs would still have connectivity.

I also spoke with network expert Matthew Ringel, a former network engineer with Tufts University who has worked extensively with BGP routers. When I asked whether he thought the US government could imitate the Egyptian model, he was dubious - but only about their ability to do it as swiftly as Egypt did. Given how complicated the US internet is, he said, "In the immediate term [shutting it down would be] very hard, bordering on impossible, but you could do it in a few days to a week."

Both Ringel and Stamos agreed that another possibility would be to cut off physical access to the internet.

Full size

There are only a limited number of cablesleading out of the U.S. to other parts of the world (see cable map above). Physically cut them and you've got what network geeks call "an air gap." No network traffic can cross the empty air between the cable's severed ends.

But wouldn't it be illegal for the U.S. government to shut down the internet?

All the scenarios for shutting down the American internet involve some degree of collusion between the government and private companies who provide internet access to millions of people in the U.S. But could the government really make AT&T shut off your network and phone? Wouldn't that be illegal?

For now, as long as the president doesn't declare martial law, it would be. There are a number of laws that protect internet service providers from government control. But that could change very soon. Several bills have been working their way through Congress that would give President Obama "kill switch" control over the internet during a "national cyber-emergency."

CNET's Declan McCullagh has been following the bills, first proposed by Senator Joe Lieberman and Senator Susan Collins. This week, he reported that the bill has been revised and is picking up steam:

The revised version includes new language saying that the federal government's designation of vital Internet or other computer systems "shall not be subject to judicial review." Another addition expanded the definition of critical infrastructure to include "provider of information technology," and a third authorized the submission of "classified" reports on security vulnerabilities.

The idea of creating what some critics have called an Internet "kill switch" that the president could flip in an emergency is not exactly new.

A draft Senate proposal that CNET obtained in August 2009 authorized the White House to "declare a cybersecurity emergency," and another from Sens. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.V.) and Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) would have explicitly given the government the power to "order the disconnection" of certain networks or Web sites. House Democrats have taken a similar approach in their own proposals.

Such a bill would allow the President to order shutdown of the American internet without any checks from the Judiciary.

Full size

This is something that worries digital liberties groups like the Electronic Frontier Foundation. Eva Galperin, an activist with the group who works on international issues, emphasized that Obama might be closer than we think to having a kill switch for the American internet. In a statement, she said:

What's going on in Egypt highlights the risk of granting any leader, up to and including the President of the United States, unilateral power to shut down portions of the internet. There have been a couple of bills in Congress which we read as potentially giving the President broad and vague powers to take emergency steps to protect the US in case of a "cyberemergency" declared by the president. Any such bill would have to be narrowly tailored for a specific threat, with review by congress and the courts.

All these legal niceties and predictions may not matter if the U.S. government perceives itself as under threat. As Galperin put it, "If the US government actually severs cables in order to cut off internet access in the US, then they have lost all regard for the rule of law and all bets are off."

Internet and the All In

Below is a  portion of a Daily Bell article.  The current class warfare, which is the very upper class using lower class to control everything, is, as the Bell sees things, moving, perhaps, too fast, that something is going wrong with the long-term, concentration of wealth plan. As Greg put is, "These people are 'all in".

Greg and I were wondering why the leftists in the U.S. are ignoring public opinion, logic, and the looming termination of their careers.  Their "all in" activity is decidedly new and contrary to triangulating everything.  Those who are all in can't articulate any consistent reasoning, other than they have to do it and besides, the  science or whatever is settled.  It may be the new communication system has had an influence.

The Internet is an amazingly disruptive influence. Internet time waits for no old socialist to organize a thought.  It does not provide for a glossy punch like in the face of rapidly evolving data. All the elite and their running dogs can think to do, of late, is attack people personally - that doesn't quite work anymore.  Again, many, if not most, people are catching on and educating themselves before being told what to think.

Were it not for the Internet, few of us would have ever heard of Swift boats or email gate. Now, it takes only an hour to publish data taken real time, like Lord Moncton's recent publishing the disruption of his meeting in Copenhagen by a bunch of American teen morons.  Obama/Alinski tactics were turned around on a worldwide basis in an hour.  The tactics of the 1960s don't work anymore.

 Moncton told the teenagers - right then - that their demonstration had already put their faces all over the world and that they were identified as Hitler Youth.  The students were almost speechless at this, he was right IN THEIR FACES.  That was supposed to be their plan. The only retort was some clown was offended at being called a Hitler Youth because he was Jewish.

The Internet can quickly defang the planners, the manipulators.  At the Moncton meeting, the published emails from East Anglia were to be discussed to show the non-scientific atmosphere among true believers.  It was the Internet that spread these words around the world.  The examples are endless.  Sure, TV told us about large crowds demanding world government to save us from my car, but who watches those shows? YouTube is far more powerful, though not for the drones.

Young people, the basic tool of the manipulators, use the Internet rather than watch the low IQs on the nightly news. Who watches that Kouric person? MSNBC? etc, etc.  This is real problem to the planners whose model involves controlling group think and creating confusion.  The best made plans gang aft agley.

Talk radio reaches older people and is another serious problem.  Again, the Swiftboats were common fare on the radio six months before the networks had to deal with the testimony of false bravado and fraud - they had to try and kill it.  To my mind, their delay killed Mr. Kerry.

 Mainstream media, and yes it exists,  eventually got its talking points out to the drones, but the rest of us already knew the entire story and are increasingly dismissing the drones.  If a person already know the story, the spin is obvious.  Now, the established media attacks the Internet with derision saying the information has not been vetted by real journalists - do they realize what they are saying?

An almost real-time video of an event is a little better than a repair job three weeks later on ABC.  If you want a news digest, I continue to recommend Xinhuanet.com, where reporters remember they are reporters. Other than that, you are on your own; perhaps the Economist will offer differing views on many matters.

Be prepared, Congress has no choice but to act against both talk radio and the Internet, and they have precious little time to act. Otherwise, the ministry of propaganda can't succeed. A serious concern is the GOP  is not a much of an alternative.  We should move beyond the idea of voting for the least bad candidate. They will still be bad.

...Here at the Bell, we do believe the pace of dominant social themes (promotions) has picked up in the 21st century just as the Fabian Society promised. Of course, we still note these are gradualist promotions - they are not out-and-out power grabs, or at least they are not meant to be. There is in fact, a very specific strategy being followed. Some of these promotions have no immediate impact in the sense they are meant merely to confuse and dismay. Others, like necessity of central banking, are endlessly pernicious and economically disastrous. They are all meant to concentrate power and wealth.

Today, we are living through the fallout - yet again - of the central banking meme. Central banking has taken root throughout the world and the results are truly ruinous. In America, as we can see from the article excerpt above, some are predicting that joblessness and general economic wretchedness may last another 20 years. We tend to agree with this, though we also think data and news will make it LOOK as if things are getting better when they are not.

Of course, the latest economic crunch could not have come at a better time for those who want to impose global change from the top down. As Western economies shudder, people are too concerned with jobs and money to worry about the larger changes taking place. Or they become more malleable as the Irish did recently and vote for authoritarian solutions such as the EU because of the hope that large government entities may provide more funding and general economic stimulation than the private sector. This is actually a false hope. Government provides with one hand and takes away with the other. Most of all government decreases opportunity and substitutes barriers to entry.

We are not surprised at the depth of the economic downturn. We are not surprised at the vehemence of those who are proposing yet more of the world's economy be socialized in pursuit of diminished cow flatulence. We are not surprised that more regulation of all types are being proposed - and always at a global level.

And yet, we wonder if the power elite is not now moving TOO quickly. And we wonder WHY it seems so driven. We wonder in fact if the power elite is not as aware as we are (and you, too) of the force for change that the Internet has become. Is it possible that the sudden rush of promotions and subsequent globalist solutions have as much to do with the Internet as they do with the sudden evolution of humankind's globalist sensibilities?

The Gutenberg press played havoc with the power elite 500 years ago. We wonder if a generational elite is not quite aware of the possibility of history repeating itself. Nothing else actually makes much sense to us (assuming you accept the above analysis.) The power elite (and its proxies) is actually acting with increasing rashness, we think. True, in the past we could cite wars, general kinds of civil chaos and variants of economic ruin in which the power elite has participated and even initiated, in our humble opinion. But this is different. This time, the power elite's machinations are being carried out in front of an Internet audience of millions. Each statement, each movement, each fraudulent announcement and every cover-up is being DOCUMENTED by a thousand, no a hundred thousand, bloggers.

Read the emails below mainstream British and American articles on any one of a number of power elite memes from global warming to swine flu to globalist financial regulation. They are mostly full of invective and disbelief. This is not the way it once was. Even a few years ago, there were fervent believers in peak oil, in global warming, in any one of a dozen promotions or more. But the Internet has exposed each of these. And people read ...

It does not take a billion, or even a hundred million, to make a worldwide change. As little as ten million converted to reality and spreading the word to family and friends can upset the apple cart in a single generation. And yes, perhaps this is happening. All the tricks have been played, after all. The world's economy is in a shambles. The globalists meet endlessly. And endless war is fought for endless peace. But we would ask you to defy, dear reader, the Orwellian hopelessness that you are supposed to feel right about now. Don't be enervated. Allow yourself the possibility of action. Human action.

Times are changing. All is not lost. We could document the unraveling of power elite memes. In fact, we do so on a regular basis. We believe the unraveling is taking place at quite a rapid pace. These social promotions in fact seem to be going backward. There is no consensus for what is about to happen in Copenhagen. The EU stumbles ahead even though most in Europe and Britain would vote it down if they had a chance. The whole idea of creating promotions was to ensure that people would accept an increased concentration of wealth and power. But it is not possible to start a serious world war right now and the Internet is muting the impact that economic ruin would ordinarily have.

We will leave it at this. We are in some sense, primarily an investment publication as we mentioned the other day. What investors - our kind of free-market thinking investors - will have to grapple with over the coming years is the struggle between the power elite's dominant social themes and the exposes of the Internet. Those who use our paradigm will have to decide if the power elite's "solutions" will win out or whether the Internet will increasingly cover - and uncover - the inevitable hype.

Conclusion: These will not be idle decisions. There are billions, nay trillions, riding on the acceptance of the green meme promotion. Thousands of companies will be started and hit major stock exchanges based on whether or not these dominant social themes are accepted and successfully promoted. That of course includes the continued appreciation of gold and silver - which the power elite despises, but which it has lost control of for the moment. Yes,