How You Feed the Ruling Class

A headline from Washington Times:

Bill Clinton cashes in on struggling nonprofit hospital

Gets $225,000 in speaking fees as workers laid off

______________

An NFP's sole job is to get more free money from the grants and donations so the staff can be paid while puttering around some purported charitable effort. This is not a definition, of course, just a real world understanding. With many NFPs, the activity of the group is political in direct contradiction of the law. Well, that is an overstatement, in violation of the U.S.Code, which is only advisory, these days.

Here, a pay-off was made to the former president, a member of the current gang running the turf, of $225,000 so he can grin and goof for an hour, which is the pretense of a service.

The hospital will claim that his appearance will loosen up donors. Probably, so?  The hospital is in the marketing/fundraising business. Mr. Clinton did not appear as a charitable contribution, no way; nor did people attend out of charity. The event was a meeting of the clan and wannabes. 

Have some food, have your picture taken with Mr. Clinton, and all the expense is a charitable deduction, which in the end is stealing tax money from ordinary people by using the deduction for "charity."  Bill Clinton is not a charity and the oligarchy is taking care of itself.

The union boss, quoted in the story, doesn't get this. He was upset his union man had taken away four or five jobs and the the hospital will claim poverty when it is time for a new contract.


He will still bite the bullet. Junkies pay the pusher, no matter how badly they are treated.

The "system," an oligarchy serving the ruling class, takes your money, obtained through confiscation, oh taxes, then, gives those who can use deductions are rebate on their political contribution.

This is not cute, it is corruption, a more correct word for theft.  

Of course, the only way to end this is to stop feeding the monster. One could adopt the leftist technique, however, of milking the system by applying for benefits and causing expense and confusion.

The way the machine wins, until the bloody end, is that it puts people in jail who resist, so the rest of us pay the protection money.  People with guts will just stop feeding the monster, but who will do it alone? A general strike would end the entire corruption of the government as it ran out of money.

In the end, we will become like Italy where people work off the books, join the distribution list of free money, and forget about obtaining useful educations or inventing new products. Will go to make work jobs, shift papers across the desk, have great pasta, then have a two month holiday. The Italians, et al,  strike when it looks there is no money to pay them; so, the government submits to another loan request to the IMF and large banks, making sure generations of children will pay for the pasta. 

In the old day, the European serfs came to the U.S. to escape the crush of oligarchy. This gaggle of freedom seekers built the strongest economy in history. Where do we go, now?

As the noose continues to tighten, the income actually leaves the country, people retire, people create purposeless deductions rather than save, citizens give up looking for work, and others join the welfare line, so, in the end, the government needs more resources. This begins a new cycle of taxes and subsequent flight. The men with the guns always find a way to pay themselves. The Russians had to put up walls to stop the diaspora.

Of course, we can still vote, sort of. The key, now, is to vote in the primaries where you vote has weight. Don't vote for a Blood or Krip, vote for someone who mentions the Constitution. (Don't confuse a patriot with someone claiming to be "conservative.") If you hear nothing but noise from the candidates vote the incumbent out.

Remember Detroit? Watch the coming deterioration of the, now, wealthy NYC, the pinnacle of business. The first task of new communist mayor is to close the horse stable (no more romantic carriage rides), to help friends. Get it, yet? New York will continue to empty even as Manhattan attracts the 1% types. "Its a nice little club you peons built - thanks.  Off you go."   

Note, the truly wealthy pay little income tax, thats for chumps who work for a salary. They pay accountants, lawyers, and politicians for proper consideration. All the posturing by Democrats never addresses real wealth.  Vote "none of the above."  

The American Diaspora has started.

An Argument for the Ron Paul counterrevolution

A long essay: take the time to read it when you are able.

So much for my goal of short pieces, but this is important

An excerpt from They Though They Were Free, The Germans From 1933 to 1945, Milton Meyer:  

But Then It Was Too Late

"What no one seemed to notice," said a colleague of mine, a philologist, "was the ever widening gap, after 1933, between the government and the people. Just think how very wide this gap was to begin with, here in Germany. And it became always wider. You know, it doesn’t make people close to their government to be told that this is a people’s government, a true democracy, or to be enrolled in civilian defense, or even to vote. All this has little, really nothing, to do with knowing one is governing.

"What happened here was the gradual habituation of the people, little by little, to being governed by surprise; to receiving decisions deliberated in secret; to believing that the situation was so complicated that the government had to act on information which the people could not understand, or so dangerous that, even if the people could not understand it, it could not be released because of national security. And their sense of identification with Hitler, their trust in him, made it easier to widen this gap and reassured those who would otherwise have worried about it... 

"To live in this process is absolutely not to be able to notice it—please try to believe me—unless one has a much greater degree of political awareness, acuity, than most of us had ever had occasion to develop. Each step was so small, so inconsequential, so well explained or, on occasion, ‘regretted,’ that, unless one were detached from the whole process from the beginning, unless one understood what the whole thing was in principle, what all these ‘little measures’ that no ‘patriotic German’ could resent must some day lead to, one no more saw it developing from day to day than a farmer in his field sees the corn growing. One day it is over his head.

"How is this to be avoided, among ordinary men, even highly educated ordinary men? Frankly, I do not know. I do not see, even now. Many, many times since it all happened I have pondered that pair of great maxims, Principiis obsta and Finem respice—‘Resist the beginnings’ and ‘Consider the end.’ But one must foresee the end in order to resist, or even see, the beginnings. One must foresee the end clearly and certainly and how is this to be done, by ordinary men or even by extraordinary men? Things might have. And everyone counts on that might.

"Your ‘little men,’ your Nazi friends, were not against National Socialism in principle. Men like me, who were, are the greater offenders, not because we knew better (that would be too much to say) but because we sensed better....

------------------------------------------------------------

Principiis obsta — Resist the beginnings 

Finem respice — Consider the end. 

------------------------------------------------------------

I titled this entry with reference to Ron Paul and what I call the counterrevolution, as we have already lost the nation to a long-term subversive revolution.  


I am not a Paulist with respect to the election game. There is a marginal chance he will be the GOP candidate, thought the year is shaping up in an interesting way, and Paul knows that. The cry of "electability" is inane; it is a cry against theory in favor of mob rule. It is a dismissal of republic in favor of democracy - the end of our nation.  


It is better the power structures realize they better adapt to the people rather than assuming the people will choose sides in the election game. They realize this by losing their own voters. Only then, do the "leaders" deign to pay attention to the masses.


Paul would be amazed if he actually won - he is leading a philosophical movement. It is important we all understand why he is doing that.


I am a Paulist with respect to the strategic push in the campaign: a cry that we had better return to the Constitution and the decentralized government. The cry is finally being understood - no one knows if it is in time. Any GOP candidate who merely cuts the government around its edges is a useful idiot who will carry us all down. 


Analogies hardly work anymore. Let us try this: your entire house is on fire, your garage is on fire and there are explosive chemicals in there. You have a choice: vote for a neighbor who insists the right thing to do is cancel you insurance or a neighbor who thinks you should move your car. Voting to move the car is a fool's vote, a Hobson's choice that is silly.


The distress over Paul's "foreign policy" is a symptom of how we have been trained to react with fear - the ultimate tool of control.  Paul says the Congress must declare war and the President act upon that direction. This is our law, but to say that is somehow "kooky." There is no legal argument offered, just a reaction found in fear - kill the enemy before they kill us, whoever you say they are.  We ignore the fact that we cannot afford anything, let along wars all over the world, because we convinced we are in a survival scenario.


Paul is perfectly happy with signing alliances with foreign friends, the correct tradition, but we are trained that the President can do what he wants. Both parties claim the authority given to the president to act under the War Powers Act is unconstitutional - both parties use it. The process of law must precede the obtaining of a desired result. Merely justifying means to reach an end is tyranny.


Of note, Paul has said the current leader of the Mosad and his predecessor do not think Israel under an existential threat.  On the other hand, our media makes a clear understanding impossible. At the same time, we are told that we need to arm (or something) to defend an Israel by having them take our money to buy our arms, as we tell them, and leftists leaders in government dislike them as the evil doers of the world.  

The Story of Your Enslavement

As a people, we are being used by the Muslims, leftists, and oligarchs. Recall a blog entry of two or three years ago where I noted the jailed "Jackal" wrote in an article the left must align itself with the Muslim terrorists for the time being. Do you see the ongoing game?


Our enemies use our presence in their lands and our blundering actions as a way to increase their power, which, in turn, result in our being told we need to ratchet up our foreign interference, without that ever being identified.  It is a vague notion of hyper-vigilance. This point-counterpoint is the history of man and, I suppose, America was not vigilant in keeping our nation a republic, so we have entered the flow of warlord history. We have a minor chance of waking up.


We are serfs being told the Muslims threaten us, so we go off on righteous crusades. This, in turn, results, as in the past, in active animosity layered on cultural and religious jingoism. The traditional war of the crusades turned into centuries of anger because of the leaders of the crusades had little to do with God.  God was for the serf to believe in as they died on the battlefields. 


Follow the spiral of reactions: the "end" is a police state and never-ending war.  We went through this with the false crusade against Russia. My proof of this is Michael Moore's film Canadian Bacon. 


I just removed a section concerning Russia and the United States and the use of escalating fear on both sides to control people, history, business. Too long. As President Nixon pointed Russia's underlying goal for hundreds of hears was to create a buffer zone around itself. It did and we reacted by placing armored divisions in Europe. The Russian leaders were not communists, they were oligarchs protecting power by manipulating people's fear.


The U.S. is controlled by the "military industrial complex" as described by President Eisenhower. It is also under the control of oligarchs using leftists. (A democratic socialist Congressman recently said Obama was not a socialist, he was a neo-liberal oligarch, which is new term to me, but I understand it.) The complex fanned the fear as well. The two sides played a game of ping pong - serving fear to one another.  Of course, both sides actually took forceful and deadly actions, but those were tactics in a bigger game. 


Russia agreed to remove its missiles from Cuba, if we removed them from its border in Turkey. That was the desired result. They won and we fell into a self-congratulating prattle about staring them down. Few even know we pulled our missiles which were on the doorstep of Russia.  We assumed we were so cowboy that Russia backed down. I should mention the oligarchy relies on the media.


The use of fear continues. The Arabs use it as a cultural gesture, such as Iraq making believe they had weapons of mass destruction. This is a stupid gambit where the enemy is vastly larger and well-trained in reacting to fear.  Iraq did use gas, of course. You can't discount dictators - a major problem. 


You will notice, these days, we take seemingly insane actions against foreign nations and "terrorists" which now means anyone the government decides it does not like.  We have recently put a few troops in Australia now to defend.....?????


The founders completely understood how oligarchs take control: fear, monetary policy, and centralization. We have lost the simple understanding of the Constitution an how it protected us from all assaults. We accept imperial actions of a government that is aloof. A government that is intent on dumbing down the people and ignoring the Constitution.


I will curtail this thread, here, and merely plead that you listen to Paul and understand what he is saying. It is profound, logically consistent, and is likely our last hope. As for the election - focus on state and school board elections. This is where the counterrevolution must take place. If you motivate people to take back their school boards in an election, the other races will take care of themselves.


Over dramatic? Reread the excerpt about Nazi Germany. 

Buffett unplugged

Consensus:  Warren Buffet is the greatest of stock pickers; solar energy is good.


Recent Headline:  "Buffett Makes a Big Bet on Solar."


Behind the Propaganda: 

Berkshire Hathaway, via MidAmerican Energy, bought a $2 billion California solar plant that is breaking ground.

MidAmerican agreed to buy a solar because of government regulation:

1. because it started in 2011, it will qualify for some $600 million in tax credits.

2. reacting to state mandates, a California firm has already signed a 25-year contract that will pay MidAmerican between two and four times today's going rate for electricity. (Just another example of why we have a "green" push to create scarcity.)

Two years ago, as I reported here, Buffet sold Berkshire's portion of a company that a few days later announce it had tanked. Buffer was on the Board of Directors. He has not been questioned, let alone prosecuted for insider trading. 

Now you see why he says nice things about Obama, when called for, as in agreeing those with large "incomes" should pay more taxes. 

His adjusted income tax rate was 11% last year. 

Buffet's salary, which the left is focused upon, is $100,000 per year. Buffet's capital gains and dividends run about $62,000,000,000. That is reduced to about half by charity and, one assumes, losses. 

You and I have very few adjustments to our salaries and they are under attack.

Bottom Line:   Oligarchy 

-------------------

Our media whips up false arguments over Republican vs. Democrat. There is no difference when you look at the leadership. We are played for chumps, then taxed.  Socialists are used; conservatives are used. The ruling class is paid well.

The tendency toward oligarchy has not changed in human history except that our founders understood the danger and in the Constitution built us a castle to defend. 

We are now permitting others, under wonderful labels and flags, to take down the castle.  No, we are supporting the dismantling as useful partisans. Remember the Communist view of WWI: two bayonets facing one another with peasants on both ends. The oligarchs were fretting over champagne.  

The media and parties do not engage Ron Paul for he merely resorts to a Constitutional basis to determine the power of the federal government;  that discussion would raise his classic concerns among the people. The false complexity presented to us by the oligarchy is meant to weaken the people's control

Oligarchy: Soros and Obama

George Soros Helped Craft Stimulus Then Invested in Companies Benefiting

by Wynton Hall

Billionaire George Soros gave advice and direction on how President Obama should allocate so-called “stimulus” money in a series of regular private meetings and consultations with White House senior advisers even as Soros was making investments in areas affected by the stimulus program.

It’s just one more revelation featured in the blockbuster new book that continues to rock Washington,Throw Them All Out, authored by Breitbart News editor Peter Schweizer.

Mr. Soros met with Mr. Obama’s top economist on February 25, 2009 and twice more with senior officials in the Old Executive Office Building on March 24^th and 25^th as the stimulus plan was being crafted.  Later, Mr. Soros also participated in discussions on financial reform.

Then, in the first quarter of 2009, Mr. Soros went on a stock buying spree in companies that ultimately benefited from the federal stimulus.

• Soros doubled his holdings in medical manufacturer Hologic, a company that benefited from stimulus spending on medical systems
• Soros tripled his holdings in fiber channel and software maker Emulus, a company that wound up scoring a large amount of federal funds going to infrastructure spending
• Soros bought 210,000 shares in Cisco Systems, which came up big in the stimulus lottery
• Soros also bought Extreme Networks, which, months later, said it was expanding broadband to rural America “as part of President Obama’s broadband strategy”
• Soros bought 1.5 million shares in American Electric Power, a company Mr. Obama gave $1 billion to in June 2009
• Soros bought shares in utility company Ameren, which bagged a $540 million Department of Energy loan
• Soros bought 250,000 shares of Public Service Enterprise Group, 500,000 shares of NRG Energy, and almost a million shares of Entergy—all companies that  came up winners in the Department of Energy taxpayer giveaway that produced the Solyndra debacle
• Soros bought into BioFuel Energy, a company that benefitted when the EPA announced a regulation on ethanol
• Soros bought Powerspan in April 2009.  Just weeks later, the clean-energy company landed $100 million from the Department of Energy
• In the second quarter of 2009, Soros bought education technology giant Blackboard, which became a big recipient of education stimulus money
• Soros also bought Burlington Northern Santa Fe and CSX, both beneficiaries of Mr. Obama’s plans for revitalizing the railroads
• Soros bought Cognizant Technology Solutions, which scored stimulus funds in education and health care technology
• Soros also bought 300,000 shares of Constellation Energy Group and 4.6 million shares of Covanta, both of which landed taxpayers’ money through the stimulus, the former of which bagged $200 million